<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.jockcoats.org.uk" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>Jock&amp;#039;s Place - Protectionist Tory euro-snoopers - Comments</title>
 <link>http://www.jockcoats.org.uk/protectionist_tory_euro_snoopers</link>
 <description>Comments for &quot;Protectionist Tory euro-snoopers&quot;</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Protectionist Tory euro-snoopers</title>
 <link>http://www.jockcoats.org.uk/protectionist_tory_euro_snoopers</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;
Thanks to Liberal conspiracy for highlighting protectionist amendments being sneaked into the Telecoms directive which MEPs will decide on tomorrow:
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;table border=&quot;1&quot;&gt;
&lt;tbody&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;
&lt;td&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
			&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.liberalconspiracy.org/2008/07/06/and-id-have-gotten-away-with-it-too-if-it-hadnt-have-been-for-those-darn-bloggers/&quot;&gt;Liberal Conspiracy » And I’d Have Gotten Away With It Too, If It Hadn’t Have Been For Those Darn Bloggers…&lt;/a&gt;
			&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
			&lt;a href=&quot;http://purplecthulhu.livejournal.com/289606.html&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;Purple Cthulhu&lt;/a&gt; and prominent Brussels-ite &lt;a href=&quot;http://nhw.livejournal.com/1059308.html&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;Nick Whyte&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
			both report on the sneaky Tories being sneaky and urge you to write to&lt;br /&gt;
			your Euro MP before they introduce a Euro Law which could take your&lt;br /&gt;
			internets away. &lt;a href=&quot;http://andrewducker.livejournal.com/1478412.html?style=mine&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;Andrew Ducker&lt;/a&gt; has already written, as &lt;a href=&quot;http://theyorkshergob.livejournal.com/102761.html&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;have many others&lt;/a&gt;.
			&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;/tbody&gt;
&lt;/table&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
The amendments basically set the scene for forcing ISPs to monitor all their customers&amp;#39; traffic to catch them sharing copyrighted material on the web and to cut customers off if they keep doing it.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Over in the comments on Matt Wardman&amp;#39;s blog posting the other day I suggested that this whole surveillance obsession smacks of &amp;quot;we do it because we can&amp;quot;. Why should one&amp;#39;s electronic communications, voice or data, be any more permissible to be snooped on than any other communication - snail mail, face to face or similar. Just because we can. For a variety of reasons electronic communications leave traces, and traces can always be tracked, but why should they be?
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
It is true that we need to have a debate about intellectual property and how, or indeed whether, it should be enforced in an era of global instant communication. It appears that the artists tend to be ahead of their production companies in exploring how to use the massive marketing opportunity that is the internet, such as recent experiments in releasing music for free, or on honesty box terms, on the web. But of course it is the media corporations and production companies that are lobbying for this sort of protectionist measure. The debate needs to be held much more widely than that though, and not snuck through where these measures were explicitly removed from the directive last time the European Parliament discussed it.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
I have written to Sharon Bowles and Emma Nicholson. I suggest everyone take a look at the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.laquadrature.net/wiki/Telecom-Package_Compromise-Amendments_ITRE-IMCO_7th-July&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;details of these amendments&lt;/a&gt; and give some thought to writing also to any of their MEPs. It is being debated tomorrow, so act fast!
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
I very fundamentally believe that the internet in particular is seen as a threat by both governments and corporations who feel they are not able to control it. For me, it is the greatest advance in people communicating with people and eventually needing far less &amp;quot;government&amp;quot; to broker their international relationships or trans-national corporations to broker their trade. But for it to bring about the vast benefits of voluntary co-operation amongst individuals around the world it needs to find its own rules, not have them imposed by those very bodies that are scared of it!
&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <comments>http://www.jockcoats.org.uk/protectionist_tory_euro_snoopers#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.jockcoats.org.uk/jocks_categories/conservative">conservative</category>
 <category domain="http://www.jockcoats.org.uk/jocks_categories/europe">Europe</category>
 <category domain="http://www.jockcoats.org.uk/jocks_categories/government_interference">government interference</category>
 <category domain="http://www.jockcoats.org.uk/jocks_categories/intellectual_property">intellectual property</category>
 <category domain="http://www.jockcoats.org.uk/jocks_categories/internet">internet</category>
 <category domain="http://www.jockcoats.org.uk/jocks_categories/liberalism">liberalism</category>
 <category domain="http://www.jockcoats.org.uk/jocks_categories/property_rights">property rights</category>
 <category domain="http://www.jockcoats.org.uk/jocks_categories/protectionism">protectionism</category>
 <category domain="http://www.jockcoats.org.uk/jocks_categories/surveillance_state">surveillance state</category>
 <category domain="http://www.jockcoats.org.uk/jocks_categories/technology">technology</category>
 <pubDate>Sun, 06 Jul 2008 09:47:59 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Jock</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">884 at http://www.jockcoats.org.uk</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
