David Davis is the sort of person...

...who makes it quite impossible for me to even think about joining or voting for the Tory party. Paul Walter today quotes from Ben Bradshaw on Davis:

Liberal Burblings: Davis: "Libertarianism" that is extremely narrow


Today, Ben Bradshaw points out Davis' far from libertarian approach to equal rights:


The notion that David Davis is a libertarian will provoke hollow laughter from Britain's gays and lesbians. Davis has opposed every freedom extended to gay and lesbian people, from the freedom to register one's partnership to the freedom to serve one's country. He has one of the worst voting records in the Commons on such matters. Like most Conservatives, Davis is very selective about whose liberties are worthy of support.


However well they might be doing, however their policies on other issues may be right, when they finally develop them, I would rather cut off my right arm or emigrate than countenance the election of reactionaries who, frankly, do not recognize me, as a gay man, as equal in rights and dignity as any other person.

Now, I know gay people in the Tory party who seem to be quite happy. I know stories, even of David Davis himself about how "some of their best friends are gay" and they are supportive of them. But there seem to be still an awful lot of them whose public policy agenda appears to want to diminish a bit of my humanity, and I can't hack that.

I think I understand the Libertarian Alliance position as explained a bit more by Sean Gabb over the weekend. But for me, there's no way I could vote for Davis or his party regardless of whether the entire election is somehow run solely on the basis of his stand on 42 days and the like. It may sound selfish but it's really not. I care less that his social conservatism focuses on gay people than I do about the fact in my mind that this means he chooses for himself what people are entitled to equality and who aren't - and nobody has that right as far as I am concerned.

Indeed, the Human Rights Act, whilst I personally don't like the way it works and would like to see most of it enshrined in a constitution and bill of rights instead, seems to me to be our sole bastion against such antediluvian attitudes amongst our "rulers".

If I still lived in the constituency of my birth I think I am being told by both Lib Dem and Libertarian leaderships that I should be grateful this man is standing up for some of my rights and they have no better candidate to offer.

Trackback URL for this post:

http://www.jockcoats.org.uk/trackback/878

Comments

What on earth does the HRA have to do with being gay? The HRA turns out (in popular opinion at least) to be a 'criminals' rights act'. Ok, DD is probably a homophobe and at 59 he is far too old to be taught that making drugs illegal causes about 100 times more harm than the drugs themselves. So I can understand you'd never vote for him (neither would I) but threatening to chop off your own arm seems a bit extreme.

...He's made HRA an issue in the by-election, which is okay, but I refer to the fact that he has also been pretty consistent in his opposition to any gay equality legislation (notwithstanding what Iain Dale has written about him).

Although in reality the only reason we have got any equality legislation seems to be to have been because of people willing to take their cases in the late eighties and nineties to the European Court of Human Rights rather than by positive government action (of governments of either party). 

...I'm not sure he is a homophobe, Mark, unless he's one of hese religious bigots who "love the sinner" in their plaintive whiney little voices as if it makes them okay.  He turned up at Iain Dale's civil partnership and probably at Alan Duncan's too, and seems to have a well known baackstory about being a good chum to Michael Brown when he was being hounded (for something not dissimilar to what a Tory candidate in Exeter was later demanding people on the local radio station he was participating in should be arrested for).

But all that just makes it worse to me.  He may b e a really good friend to his gay friends, but fails to put that into action by consistently pretty well either absenting himself or voting against law reform on sexual orientation issues.

Happy, it seems, to have one rule for his mates but decide that others should be kept unequal by the law.  That seems to have been a constant trait in the Tory party over decades. 

Add comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
To combat spam, please enter the code in the image.