'He who controls the present controls the past and he who controls the past controls the future' - George Orwell - 1984
'Dictatorship of the proletariat will always become dictatorship of the bureaucrat.' - George Monbiot - The Age of Consent
I can never get people to understand that poetry is the expression of excited passion, and that there is no such thing as a life of passion any more than a continuous earthquake, or an eternal fever. Besides, who would ever shave themselves in such a state? Lord Byron, in a letter to Thomas Moore, 5 July 1821

Comic

Comic

Did you know:

...that 100% of divorces start with marriage?

Sunday, 19 October 2008

The attempted coup on Elaine Bagshaw head of Liberal Youth

Yesterday was my first Liberal Youth conference, I didn't really know what to expect and frankly I went more in search of a break from Norwich, uni and stress than for the networking and training benefits I expected to receive from this short weekender exercise.

Well I didn't quite get a break, in fact far from it, and although I made some good contacts, learned a lot and thoroughly enjoyed the day the last event of the evening quite ruined everything.

Elaine Bagshaw, recent chair of Liberal Youth, was nearly sacked tonight by conference.


Elaine Bagshaw with Cllr. Chris Ward, an hour or two before the vote of no confidence

I'll lay it down for you in narrative: the day had been productive, good humored and fun, we had decided it would be a good idea to ban mosquito devices, lower the drinking age to 16 for beer and wine and had listened to a very healthy debate between Stephen Williams MP and David Howarth MP on higher education funding and afterwards decided to keep our position on fees. The atmosphere had been good and although now I recall a couple of the exec members being a little anxious I had honestly heard nothing to prepare me for what happened next in the last part of today's conference activities.

We had just been receiving a talk by the very competent and fun Martin Shapland and Simon Radford on the Save Darfur campaign and the room was relatively full when we moved onto the next item, the reports of the the exec. It all seemed quite good, when the chair of the event asked if there were going to be any votes of no confidence and no one raised their hand it was joked 'that's a first' by one of the people there.

It was at this point that the chair was handed a note. He read it, his expression was surprised and his tone changed quite significantly, more emotional, quivering almost. He told us that there had been a proposed vote of no confidence for Elaine Bagshaw, the chair of Liberal Youth. The people proposing the motion were the following: Ben Mathis, England convenor, Naomi Smith, Chris Butler, James Shaddock and Dominique (Head of liberal youth essex) and quite possibly one or two other people though I forget the names.

They made their case well with preprepared speeches: Elaine had been incompetent, had lied, and had become near impossible to work with, this was a last resort. People were shocked, Michael Atkins, the brilliant policy wonk of Liberal Youth, had absolutely no idea this was going to happen until he found Elaine outside the main room on her own looking understandably anxious. The case was made for Elaine, by herself as well as by others, we had no preparation and no knowledge whatsoever that this was going to happen, still we tried to defend her.

Elaine had been under a lot of stress, she had cocked up quite a few things but a lot of those things weren't just her responsibility. Ealine admitted to the failures of the freshers packs and told conference that these people should have talked to her if they were unhappy rather than just spring it out of the blue in a vote of no confidence. She had built up better relationships with the party and was trying to set liberal youth onto the right direction.

I was listening to what others were saying around me, they frankly didn't have a clue what they were voting on, they didn't know what had gone on behind the scenes at the exec or whether Elaine deserved sacking! The proposers didn't seem to have understood the first rule of no confidence motions, win them before you fight them.
Me (left) and Vincent McCrae (right) in the main conference room moments before the proposal of the vote of no confidence.

I made a speech, more out of anger with the proposers than out of any support for Elaine.

Everything we had done that day and tried to achieve would have been overshadowed by this. Relationships would have been further hurt rather than repaired and Elaine's reputation will be seriously damaged, this was the wrong place, the wrong time and the wrong method. Coming in all at once in a small group with preprepared speeches in an attempt to sack the head of the organization without anyone else having a clue about it looked, to be frank, underhand. Labour students and Conservative Future were the only winners from this act.

When it came to the vote, most people abstained, it wasn't passed, nobody apart from the original proposers voted for the motion of no confidence.

Naomi talked to me about it afterwards, she seemed to suggest that everything would just carry on as usual. I told her that probably wasn't going to be the case and that she and the other rebels needed to have a long sit down and talk with Elaine and the rest of the exec if they wanted things to work. If this Liberal Youth was a business it is quite likely that the rebels would have been sacked by now. What they did was stupid; working relationships are complicated intricate things, you don't try to fix with them with hammers.

I just hope the wounds can heal and people can get on with it. I depend on Liberal Youth for a lot of my activism and young people need a strong voice in the party.

Saturday, 13 September 2008

The "lipstick pit-bull" goes to war

Saturday, 16 August 2008

Inside USA- Face to Face with John Bolton-15 Aug 08- Part 1

Friday, 15 August 2008

Is Iraq ready to explode?

Comicon 2008 - whod do nerds endorse for president?

Tuesday, 8 July 2008

Public health warning - Joining the BNP will make you thick

So my brief internet encounter with young BNP members on facebook seems to be at an end. I've removed all names and pictures for privacy's sake. Below is the thread laid out as it was on Facebook. I think the thing to take from it is a look in on mentality of BNP members. Tribal, reactionary, paranoid and sadly narrow minded. It became quickly apparent that these young BNP members had been near indoctrinated with the sense that the BNP are right and good purveyors of justice fighting against an evil liberal fascist elite. The effects of such a sad distortion of reality inflicted upon these people reminds me of the way 9/11 truthers respond to attacks - 'your just a drone of the government aren't you!'. I do warn bad language has been used.

BNP friend from uni
In response to the ludicrously vulgar 'Guess who Batman' by Lily Allen where she attacks the BNP with a torrent of foul and abusive language, Great White Records' Joey Smith releases this rebuttal...

http://www.myspace.com/joeysmithuk

john Dixon
ohhh jeeez, please i'm not interested!
BNP member 1
lol yeah its quite a good song..

In the same sort of style as her song, which makes it crap music but I like it...also theres not enough people in the music industry confronting the scum like Lily Allen, Amy Winehouse, Britney etc who have taken it over, so hats off to Joey!

On his myspace listen to "Never wanna leave" and "its not just about the music" - great, upbeat modern patriotic songs...also "Jack McEwan", a sad one about a British soldier killed in Iraq.

Cheers all
NG for PM!!

John Dixon
god help us.
BNP member 1
Yes God help us with the scum like Lily Allen influencing our young people!!

John Dixon
lolz you sound like an eighty year old woman from the 50s.

BNP Friend's Girlfriend
Sod off (Boyfriend) I'm going to have three weeks of you harpering on the BNP. Let me enjoy my last day of peace without you giving me earache! xxx

BNP friend from uni
Just wondering how John would react =P

BNP member 1
And you sound like a drug smoking hippie from the 60s. Weirdo.

BNP member 2
who the fuck is 'John Dixon' anyways?

BNP friend from uni
lol, i'm sure he won't mind me saying he's a lefty from uni =P

BNP member 2
I see.
Looks and speaks like a right toby.

Friend from uni
(BNP friend from uni), I have absolutely no interest in that insult to British politics, so why bother tell me about it?? And much as I dislike Lily Allen good on her for speaking some sense for a change.

BNP friend's girlfriend
Honestly (friend from uni) when is this plank going to realise we don't give a monkeys? And we have to live with him as of August 1st *rolls eyes*

BNP member 1
Good on her for speaking some sense?! Have you heard the chorus to her pathetic song? How very well thought out and political, what a great argument! Lily Allen is the insult to Britain!

John Dixon

keep digging (BNP member 1)

BNP friend from uni

Don;t encourage him lol... cos he'll dig

Friend from uni 2
i'm predicting trouble in the house in august lol

good luck people ;-)
Friend from uni
So, basically you are arguing that anything that is anti-BNP in the slightest sense is akin to being un-British (if there is such a ruddy thing). If that's the case then Britain'll be a very lonely place with a majority of its population missing, won't it?? And as a matter of fact I have heard the song, yet you neglect to understand that I was discussing the content, not its musical attributes (if any).

John Dixon
Nooooo, (Friend from uni), don't encourage them!!! fights with nationalists always tend to be rather depressing chest thumping affairs

BNP member 1
(Friend from uni), there will always be people who are anti-BNP who are not an insult to Britain; but I'm afraid the lyrics to that song ARE anti-British values - its a deliberate attempt to force feed foul mouthed language and by using terms such as medieval, small minded, not fit to tie my laces, evil, haters, etc, is attempting to take away the democratic respect that young people who listen to her music should have for our views. That is why I call it anti-British, anti-democracy and foul mouthed language ARE anti-British values.

I'm also not mad about celebs trying to use their position of influence to force feed people their political view, either. Most anti-British.

John Dixon
told you (Friend from uni), this is why we don't let the BNP on question time, its not because we're anti free speech, its because they're bat shit crazy

BNP member 1
'bat shit crazy' LOL bloody hell what is the education system coming to?!

Sorry perhaps your lefty friends aren't capable of presenting a sensible argument to you and having a debate about it, so you're not used to it. I take it as a compliment that people like you can never respond politely and sensibly to any of our points!

Unfortunately you seem to be one of the many people who have been successfully 'dumbed down' by society into either not caring when you should, or not being intelligent enough to understand what you're supposed to be caring about, which is why you persist in using rather ambiguous terms like 'bat shit crazy' to deflect the attention from the point made.

John Dixon
it wasn't meant to be an intellectual argument, it was a statement, you do literally sound bat-shit crazy, no disrespect
BNP member 3
If you delve into the sphere of politics you have to make an intellectual argument. Otherwise it's just an unfounded insult which is anti democratic as it just paints an entire group of people with a totally false image.
Furthermore the language used in the song is highly inappropriate for someone trying trying to take the moral high ground.
Now seeing as Britain is one of the oldest continous democracys in the world i dont think its unfair to label this song as Anti British.

Now let me ask you a question, why call the bnp "bat shit crazy" when it is they who make all the sensible and intelectual arguments while you mereley reply with a few chidish insults and obsenitys. And John, try to make your reply a few paragraphs long, and do try not to say "bat shit crazy" i know its hard for you.

John Dixon
'If you delve into the sphere of politics you have to make an intellectual argument.'
-no you don't, if you delve into political theory then perhaps, but this is hardly on that level
'Otherwise it's just an unfounded insult'
-no it was a founded insult, what chris is saying is reactionary, stupid and pinheaded.
'which is anti democratic as it just paints an entire group of people with a totally false image.'
-no it isn't, purposefully deceiving large numbers of people is 'anti democratic', saying somebody's remarks are thick or just disliking people and singing about it isn't
'Furthermore the language used in the song is highly inappropriate for someone trying trying to take the moral high ground.'
-not really, nothing wrong with a bit of swearing, sometimes saying a good ole 'fuck you' can help get your message across. its a song, not a manifesto. I don't see how calling Lily Allen pondlife is in any way different to what she's done, although an eye for an eye eh

Throughout this entire thread I have been struck by the responses of the BNP supporters. They remind me more of communists trying to defend the purges than of anything else; narrow minded and deeply partisan, 'he who fights with dragons eventually becomes the dragon himself' I guess. I don't want an intellectual argument with you, frankly by the looks of what people have already said it would be quite fruitless.

BNP member 2
LOL

BNP member 3
Ah finally, its nice to see that the "liberal" opposition can provide an intelligable answer.

"no you don't, if you delve into political theory then perhaps, but this is hardly on that level" - If you knowingly make a statement about a Nationalist Party, then you are also making a statement about the Nationalist Doctraine which the party represents. Therefore if you do remark on the doctraine you are on "that level".

"no it was a founded insult, what chris is saying is reactionary, stupid and pinheaded" - To which of chris' comments exactly did you find reactionary, stupid and pinheaded?

"no it isn't, purposefully deceiving large numbers of people is 'anti democratic', saying somebody's remarks are thick or just disliking people and singing about it isn't" - Lilly Allen is a famous Singer and any song she writes will be heard by large numbers of people. She is misleading these people when it comes to the nationalist doctraine, rather than letting people make thier own mind up about somthing, she tell her audience that Nationalism is Evil without backing up the claim with evidence.

"not really, nothing wrong with a bit of swearing, sometimes saying a good ole 'fuck you' can help get your message across. its a song, not a manifesto. I don't see how calling Lily Allen pondlife is in any way different to what she's done" - People are only forced to swear when they have a limited vocabulary and cannot expess thier frustration in a more articulate manor, this only goes to weaken Lilly Allens point that Nationalists are Intellectually Challenged. Furthermore as the word Fuck is commonly seen as offensive it is innapropprite for someone trying to take the moral high ground.


BNP member 1
Essentially our good friend John's main argument against us if we are, "pinheaded"; "intellectually challenged"; "stupid"'; "reactionary"; and "bat-shit crazy" (I guess thats some regional dialect that we haven't picked up here!)

He does of course mantain that he, 'doesn't want an intellectual argument with us', no, John, not very many people like you seem to want to hold stimulating intellectual debate, its a strange trend among the Liberal-Left!!

I think you're probably suffering from the common condition known as Liberal-Fascism, that is to say, the belief that ones own world outlook supposedly of freedom, equality and justice is inherantly 'correct', this condition being brought on by growing up with years of the media and establishment telling you that you're correct (people like Lily Allen), and you subsequently have little or no desire to extend your values of freedom and social inclusion to people who come outside your, somewhat limited, Liberal sphere of what views are acceptable, thus you seek to evade those who threaten your world outlook with the power of their arguments, by using ambiguous phrases which attempt to slander, poke fun at, and/or degrade your opponents. Typical Liberal trait I'm afraid.

John Dixon
I won't respond to anything else, to do so would be like an odd combination of trying to teach the blind to see and telling a young obstinate child that Santa Clause isn't real. This however (among other things you've written) just cracked me up

'People are only forced to swear when they have a limited vocabulary and cannot expess thier (OMGOMG SPELLING MISTAKES!!!!!)frustration in a more articulate manor, this only goes to weaken Lilly Allens point that Nationalists are Intellectually Challenged(Your doing a good job of making that point for her though). Furthermore as the word Fuck is commonly seen as offensive it is innapropprite (USE SPELLCHECKER!!!!)for someone trying to take the moral high ground.'

What utter bollocks, what cumduddling noncetwatting weasel fucking turd from a whore! Swearing? an example of limited vocabulary, my dear friend the world of swearing is a sweet cacophony of english literature to be explored and used. when brought forth in an appropriate manner a good flipping off can be very effective. And after all, Its just a song, you dolts, you retarded fuckwitted college rejected indoctrinated nutcases, it doesn't have to be politically correct, she can say what she wants about you, she doesn't owe you any responsibility. :-)
BNP suck cock in my anus ;-)

BNP member 2
BNP suck cock in my anus?
There was me thinking this arguement was formulated to try and force a sensible response from some mature young adults.
Its evident that, Mr Dixon, who ever the fuck you are (oh no i swore which means i cant express my frustration in an articulate manor), cant supply us an arguement thats really worth compelling.
"Its like trying to teach a blind man to see"
The only person here whos blind is yourself, whos forced into mainstream politics because you actually have no values or beliefs to call your own.
And if you want some english literature have a listen to this:
"Crawl under your rock and stay there you fucking toby"
Oh no i did it again, it must be "bat shit crazy"

BNP member 3
Ok, fair enough, I can't spell.

If swear words where such an important part of the english language, commanding such respect and offending nil, why don't our friends in parliament use them all the time, oh wait, thats because what you are saying is utter twaddle.
It is clear that you are not a liberal, but a government drone who will obey any order to detest the governments enemy. If you truly belived in a free market of Ideas where they could be discussed and the best ones would rise to the fore, then you would not support anti-intelectualism so veermently. You will never be truly free, until you can think for yourself.

John Dixon
My last comment was never meant to be either particularly serious or intellectual. I don't know about our parliament and swear words (underhanded derisory comments seem to be what they use in our house of representatives which, of course, can be far more hurtful) but you should check out the Aussie parliament, its wonderfully vulgar at times. I love the way you guys have already created a straw man and totally misinterpreted me. (BNP member 3's) conspiracy theory is absolute solid gold though.
John Dixon
I like the term 'liberal fascist' as well, did you nick that from Jonah Goldberg by any chance?
BNP member 2
Shes pond life at the end of the day.
Her life is in such a mess, she isnt in any position to comment about the thoughts of other people.
BNP member 1
"I like the term 'liberal fascist' as well, did you nick that from Jonah Goldberg by any chance?"

Nick Griffin coined it, I believe.

Won't be able to post again as I'm off to Hungary for a few days. I'm afraid John that you're typical of our generation, it doesn't bode well for the future. You probably care more about when you'll get your next fix or what you'll be doing Friday night than the problems facing the world. I hate the way society has dumbed people like you down into being nothing more than drones who think they're clever when they use insulting linguistic phrases that a fifteen year old could come up with.

Hey ho, theres probably worse than you!

(Ends)


The key question I think is how do we deal with these people? Perhaps ridicule and humour would be a good method, there's a lot of ammo to use after all.

Friday, 4 July 2008

Fun with the BNP

If you haven't heard it already Lily Allen has written a song telling the BNP to 'fuck off''. In response Great White Records' Joey Smith has come out with his own pop song very wittily saying 'a lily is just pond life'. Now usually I just wouldn't be interested , but for some reason or other I have become embroiled in a debate with BNP members on Facebook thanks to an invitation from a BNP supporting friend from uni.
At first it was rather depressing to watch the BNP trolls try to claim Lily Allen had committed some form of Treason by speaking her mind in a pop song. Through time though its actually become quite fun watching them fall over their own idiocy in a hapless attempt to appear, well, intelligent. Half the time they sound like old women from the 50s, the other half like indoctrinated communist foot soldiers. Baiting them is perhaps cruel but I suppose the best way to hit someone over the head with a frying pan is to allow them to do it themselves. I'll post the entire thing up when its over.