Randomly Selected Article or Link

I noticed this in the Oxford Mail the other day:

Get Rid Of Gravestones Says Councillor (from thisisoxfordshire):

UNSTABLE gravestones in Bicester's cemetery have been laid flat and could be thrown away if not claimed by relatives within two years.

In the past, Bicester Town Council has repaired unsafe headstones, but councillors say it is simply becoming too expensive.

A total of 28 unsafe memorials, whose owners cannot be traced, have been laid flat or cordoned off in the cemetery.

At a meeting last week, town councillor Carol Steward said the council needed to adopt a firm policy for the future.

She told fellow councillors she believed unsafe memorials should be removed, stored for two years and then disposed of if relatives had still not come forward.

She said: "People could miss an anniversary or Christmas for two years. Any less and I think we would be doing the families a disservice.

"This is the only way the council can afford to go forward. It is a very, very costly item for which we are not actually responsible we have been doing it to be fair to everyone. We have to draw the line somewhere."

Now, it may be a bit morbid, but these stones are our future's history. Whether they leave people behind to look after them or not, are the memories of those people simply to be erased after two years? There are odd rules governing management of cemeteries in this country for a very good reason. We have municipal and church owned graveyards. When a church one gets full, it is "closed" and responsibility for managing it in perpetuity falls on the local council.

Now I realise Bicester is looking more and more like some anonymous "new town" as a result of housing policies. But that does not mean the people there should have their memorials and memories wiped out so presumptuously.

How much will rebuilding the Garth cost compared with this saving, by the way?

Hat tip to a wonderful post from South Africa about Britain's surveillance culture in which Chris Rodrigues reminds us that it was Nicolae Ceausescu who often pushed the surveillance state in totalitarian Romania with the now much overused saying that "if you've got nothing to hide you've got nothing to worry about".

We hear it all the time in Britain whenever someone starts complaining about the "surveillance state", as if just not being a criminal makes it okay to have your movements tracked, your DNA held on file or your telephone tapped. And yet again, in the wake of the two high profile convictions last week of Steve Wright and Mark Dixie, people have been calling for a full national DNA database.

Whilst it's not a terribly palatable subject, one wonders just how many DNA samples one might collect from a prostitute. Their work gets pretty intimate. One of these two fiends was on the existing database yet that doesn't seem to have been enough for the police - they want us all on the database, so they can trawl through every little sample they find at a crime scene, presumably using more computer power than Los Alamos to match up then round up casual crime scene visitors who will have nothing to do with the crime yet inevitably some will end up having to explain their innocent presence there.

No, it's time to call a halt to this expansion of the creepy, big brother state. My DNA is part of me. I may unwittingly leave bits of it lying around all over the place but to take some off me for cataloguing and storage is it seems to me a breach of habeas corpus. You're asking to hold a little bit of me in perpetuity, like a miniature electronic tag so you can reel me in whenever my DNA appears anywhere near a crime.

The fact is that Steve Wright and Mark Dixie were caught and were convicted. The existence or not of their DNA on a super-duper database doesn't seem to have prevented justice being done eventually. Good old police work was what did for them. That's where it should stop.

Hot on the heels of a few moans (by me not least, here ) that Chris Huhne needs to produce something like Nick Clegg's comprehensive "Vision for Britain" document so we can all pick it apart and say how good it is, supporters will have received news that Chris will "launch his manifesto with a keynote speech" on Wednesday at noon.

Well...what is a person to do to celebrate the close of nominations when he's already handed his in days ago?

It's a great rarity for me to be heard praising any member of the dysfunctional "Wal-Mart family" but Cod taken off the shelves at Asda to preserve stocks is surely worth some. Well done ASDA.

Don't get me wrong, I love cod. But I love it too much to see the ugly great brutes (and especially the uglier little tyke young'uns now being taken) eradicated by over-fishing.